<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Radek's Tech Blog &#187; fragment provisioning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://urbas.tk/index.php/tag/fragment-provisioning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://urbas.tk</link>
	<description>Radoslaw H. Urbas homepage / blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 20:31:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>p2 and fragments</title>
		<link>http://urbas.tk/index.php/2009/05/18/p2-and-fragments/</link>
		<comments>http://urbas.tk/index.php/2009/05/18/p2-and-fragments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 20:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Radoslaw Urbas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Eclipse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fragment provisioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbas.tk/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I&#8217;m getting a bit confused about p2. There is an update site created with PDE headless build. There are IUs generated for each plug-in/fragment/feature. Everything looks great so far. Let&#8217;s assume: plug-in A and fragment B with a defined host plug-in A are sitting together on single update site. Plug-in A in reality cannot [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently I&#8217;m getting a bit confused about p2. There is an update site created with PDE headless build. There are IUs generated for each plug-in/fragment/feature. Everything looks great so far.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s assume: plug-in A and fragment B with a defined host plug-in A are sitting together on single update site. Plug-in A in reality cannot run without appropriate version of fragment B (e.g. situation similar  to SWT).</p>
<p>My understanding of p2-power was that I wouldn&#8217;t need to create separate feature C aggregating A and B just to make fragment B be automatically installed when I request installation of plug-in A.</p>
<p>I spent some time on reviewing Eclipse Bugzilla and mailing lists. Interesting findings:</p>
<p><a title="http://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox_p2_Meeting_2007#Fragments_optional_vs._requirement" href="http://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox_p2_Meeting_2007#Fragments_optional_vs._requirement" target="_blank">http://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox_p2_Meeting_2007#Fragments_optional_vs._requirement</a></p>
<p><a title="https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=256430" href="https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=256430" target="_blank">https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=256430</a></p>
<p>Any suggestions about handling such &#8220;required&#8221; fragment scenario without getting rid of autogenerated p2 repository and hand crafting p2 metadata?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://urbas.tk/index.php/2009/05/18/p2-and-fragments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
